Eagle One (USN Ret.)
by on January 6, 2020
28 views
It’s becoming increasingly difficult to view the Democrat Party as being anything other than an ally to those wanting to destroy America. And we should need no further proof of that than the extent to which Democrats continue to claim outrage over the recent death by missile of Qasem Soleimani. Because to hear Democrats speak of him you would think that this man was nothing short of a saint and whose death was tantamount to cold blooded murder. However, in truth he was one of the most diabolically evil men to have ever walked the Earth, a fact that seems to matter very little to Democrats in their continuing effort to malign President Trump.
Case in point would be Democrat Chris Coons who, during Sunday’s broadcast of MSDNC’s “Kasie DC,” commented on the U.S. military’s airstrikes in Baghdad which resulted in the death of Soleimani. Coons said he is “hoping” the President Trump had “clear justification” for ordering the strikes, but he voiced his lack of confidence that it does because it “has had an uneven relationship with the truth.” Coons is another of those hypocrites who never once objected to any action, what little of it there was, taken by ex-president Barry ‘O.’ But then Barry was a Democrat and President Trump is not, and that’s really what this continues to be all about.
Mr. Coons explained to host Kasie Hunt, “I’m hoping that the administration has a clear justification for this step, but I’m not confident they do.” And he went on to say, “The Trump administration has had an uneven relationship with the truth when it comes to the testimony we have heard over the last few weeks before the House Intelligence Committee and in front of Congress about the remarkable steps taken by the administration to dangle badly needed military aid in front of a vulnerable partner, Ukraine, that has faced aggression from Russia.” It’s odd that we have a Democrat accusing anyone of having an “uneven relationship with the truth!”
Coons went on to add, “It’s concerning that the Trump administration may have allowed political concerns to influence this decision. That’s something we’ll have to weigh in the classified briefing in the week ahead. Frankly, more than anything, Kasie, the Trump administration owes the American people a clear strategy and a justification for why they would escalate our tensions with Iran.” Personally, what we’ve gotten from President Trump is a much clearer strategy then anything we’ve ever gotten from ANY Democrat going all the way back to that dipshit, Jimmy Carter. The strategy seems pretty clear, to kill those seeking to kill us before they can.
Sadly this thug Soleimani was treated as untouchable by the two administrations that preceded President Trump, even as they held him personally responsible for the deaths of hundreds of U.S. service members in Iraq, for fear of the severity of any potential retaliation from Iran. And I have no reason to doubt that President Trump was presented with the very same information that had been presented to his predecessors, and his decision to ignore it will likely reverberate around the Middle East for decades. In searching for a rationale for taking Soleimani’s out we really need look no further than the trail of bloodshed left in his wake all across the region.
The most defining legacy in the Middle East of the man who ran Tehran’s insurgency against U.S. forces in Iraq was not the deaths of hundreds of U.S. service members, nor even the wave of political assassinations that he masterminded throughout the last two decades. Soleimani made his mark through his unrestrained barbarity towards civilians in both Syria and Iraq, and he was personally responsible for the deaths of literally thousands of innocent people. These would include the hundreds of Iraqi civilians who were shot dead by Iraqi security forces, acting directly under his orders. Such is the man that many Democrats, like Coons, now seem to mourn.
Soleimani was brutal, merciless, and ruthlessly efficient at his trade, slaughtering his way across the Middle East. If he could not bulldoze his way through civilian infrastructure, he had a near endless supply of impoverished, forcibly recruited Shia conscripts from Afghanistan and Pakistan that he could send over the trenches in World War One-like human wave attacks until all resistance was broken, their lives apparently as cheap to him as the lives of the civilian protest movements that he crushed. And yet we have those like Coons whining about a “clear justification.” But then we all know that the death of innocents matters very little to Democrats.
Now in trying to make it simple enough so that even a guy like Coons should be able to understand it, I would like to borrow language from a certain ex-secretary of state and two time loser for president, and say that when it comes to the death of this certifiable mad man, “what difference, at this point, does it make?” But perhaps such a perspective is only to be accepted when it’s made in reference to Americans who have been killed, and when those responsible for those deaths are Democrats. It may not actually apply when used in reference to the death of man responsible for the death of thousands, a death ordered by a president who is a Republican.
And I cannot be the only one wondering why it is that the Democrats find it appropriate to go ballistic when a known terrorist gets dusted by Americans, but feel quite comfortable in ignoring it whenever Americans are assassinated by terrorists. And President Trump has every reason to keep a lid on these types of operations because Democrats simply are not to be trusted not to reveal what it is that they have been told in confidence. And you can’t help but to have noticed how it is that whenever the Democrats are kept in the dark it’s very few, if any, American lives that are lost and the operation in question tends to come off pretty much without a hitch.
So Democrats continue to make glaringly obvious that there is good reason to leave them out of the decision making process regarding the taking out of dangerous known terrorists. Their un-American, blatantly one sided attempt to nullify our votes and expel President Trump are a clear indication that they seek to rule by force and the rest of us be damned! The Democrats willingly gave away their right to have a voice in the President's ridding the world of violent people, like this guy Soleimani, who have already killed thousands of their own people as well as our military members. This was not a declaration of war, it was nothing more than a preemptive action.
And now comes word that Nancy Pelosi wrote a letter to her Democrat colleagues in the House on Sunday to reveal a new “War Powers Resolution” that amounts to a pre-emptive surrender to Iran in ongoing hostilities. Pelosi’s letter begins with the declaration that President Trump’s airstrike last week targeting Qasem Suleimani, leader of the terrorist Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IGRC) Quds Force, responsible for the murders of hundreds of Americans and for recent attacks on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, was “provocative and disproportionate,” terms suggesting the attack was illegal under international law and could constitute a war crime.
The Democrats insist upon making it increasingly difficult for anyone with a brain to take them seriously as a viable political party. I mean how is that we’re supposed to listen to all that these people say about a president who seeks nothing more than to keep America safe and prosperous and still be able to judge them to be, in any way, responsible enough to be placed in positions of power? Have they even once stopped to consider how many lives have now been saved because this murderous butcher has been sent off to meet up with his 72 virgins? Likely not, because for Democrats death is like an aphrodisiac and now a great perpetrator of death is no longer among us.
Post in: Politics
Be the first person like this