Eagle One (USN Ret.)
by on January 4, 2020
33 views
I think we are all quite familiar, or we should be by now, with the peculiar Democrat penchant for wanting to rewrite history so as to make it appear more Democrat ‘friendly.’ And how it is, more often than not, that Democrats tend to be for something before then being against before again, depending on political points to be gained or lost, being for it again. I know, it’s confusing but stay with me because I do have a point in bringing this up. Apparently Democrats are of the opinion that there is absolutely no one who is going to do a little checking up on the claims they make.
But lo and behold, we did. And stranger still is how we have evidence of how current Democrat contender and ex-vice president, ‘Crooked Joe,’ recently got more than a bit ‘creative,’ to put it nicely. You see, it was as recently as this past Friday that ex-vice president ‘Crooked Joe’ told a reporter from ‘Fox News’ that he had not actually advised ex-president Barry ‘O’ against ordering the attack that killed Islamic terrorist Osama bin Laden. Now either ‘Crooked Joe’ is suffering from some age related memory or he’s as we have video and documentary evidence counters his claim.
It all started when at a campaign stop that ‘Crooked Joe’ was asked, “If you were ever handed a piece of intelligence that said you can stop an imminent attack on Americans but you have to use an airstrike to take out a terror leader, would you pull the trigger?”
“Well, we did,” ‘Crooked Joe’ confidently responded. “Guy’s name was Osama bin Laden.”
He was then asked, “Didn’t you tell President Obama not to go after bin Laden?”
‘Crooked Joe’ again responded saying, “No, I didn’t. I didn’t.”
But not long after this exchange it was a strange thing that happened. It was when Trump communications staffer, Zach Parkinson, tweeting footage of ‘Crooked Joe’ in 2012 explaining his role in the 2011 raid planning saying: “The president, he went around the table with all the senior people, including the chiefs of staff, and he said, ‘I have to make a decision. What is your opinion?’ He started with the national security advisor, the Secretary of State, and he ended with me. … He said, ‘Joe, what do you think?’ And I said … ‘Mr. President, my suggestion is, don’t go.'”
But there was more to come that would make very clear that ‘Crooked Joe’ was not being exactly honest, (big shock there, right) when it came to where he stood regarding the elimination of bin Laden. You see, it was also courtesy of some documentary evidence from some of ‘Crooked Joe’s’ administration contemporaries including such folks as ex-Secretary of State Hitlery, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates, former White House Press Secretary Jay Carney and others that also made clear that ‘Crooked Joe’ had indeed opposed the raid. Tell me it isn’t so!!
And it was Parkinson who also tweeted 2012 debate footage showing Barry ‘O’ himself confirming our ex-vice president’s position. We see Barry telling then Republican nominee Romney: “When it comes to going after Osama bin Laden, you said, well, any president would make that call. But when you were a candidate in 2008 … you said we shouldn’t move heaven and earth to get one man, and you said we should ask Pakistan for permission. … And even some in my own party, including my current vice president, had the same critique as you did.”
So I believe what we have here may be yet another textbook example of what’s called the double-reverse-Kerry-Heinz maneuver where one was against something before one was for it then at the perfect time one able to honestly say one was both for and against it because instead one preferred to personally go to Pakistan and challenge bin Laden to a push up contest. It has been noted that ‘Crooked Joe’ has been wrong on every single important foreign policy and national security issue that came about during his entire time in politics. He is that last person who should be our president.
Post in: Politics
 reacted this